<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Offshore and Code Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pragmaticoutsourcing.com/2009/07/07/offshore-and-code-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pragmaticoutsourcing.com/2009/07/07/offshore-and-code-review/</link>
	<description>Tips, tricks and traps of IT offshore outsourcing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 03:16:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Krym</title>
		<link>http://pragmaticoutsourcing.com/2009/07/07/offshore-and-code-review/#comment-634</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Krym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragmaticoutsourcing.com/?p=920#comment-634</guid>
		<description>Very interesting point, frankly I have never tried it.  My initial thought is that could be rather expensive (due to ramp up and domain knowledge issues), but setting that aside seems like a very interesting idea.  To some degree it is very similar to what is commonly done by larger organizations that  can afford groups dedicated to quality and processes... A third party dedicated to code review can be very successful assuming that people involved are experts in both technology and diplomacy (rare combination i have to admit).  it would be especially difficult to stay Switzerland when one of the coders come from offshore; too much politics and tension to begin with. ... Very interesting - I will check with some of my friends if they have any real experience in the process, will blog if i find something interesting. Thank you, Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting point, frankly I have never tried it.  My initial thought is that could be rather expensive (due to ramp up and domain knowledge issues), but setting that aside seems like a very interesting idea.  To some degree it is very similar to what is commonly done by larger organizations that  can afford groups dedicated to quality and processes&#8230; A third party dedicated to code review can be very successful assuming that people involved are experts in both technology and diplomacy (rare combination i have to admit).  it would be especially difficult to stay Switzerland when one of the coders come from offshore; too much politics and tension to begin with. &#8230; Very interesting &#8211; I will check with some of my friends if they have any real experience in the process, will blog if i find something interesting. Thank you, Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Krym</title>
		<link>http://pragmaticoutsourcing.com/2009/07/07/offshore-and-code-review/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Krym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragmaticoutsourcing.com/?p=920#comment-633</guid>
		<description>good point Gregg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good point Gregg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregg Sporar</title>
		<link>http://pragmaticoutsourcing.com/2009/07/07/offshore-and-code-review/#comment-632</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg Sporar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragmaticoutsourcing.com/?p=920#comment-632</guid>
		<description>One of the things we&#039;ve consistently seen with teams that do code reviews across multiple locations is that team cohesion improves. In other words, while the quality impact is, of course, paramount the social effects can also be important. More information thoughts on the social effects available here: http://smartbear.com/docs/CodeReviewSocialEffects.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the things we&#8217;ve consistently seen with teams that do code reviews across multiple locations is that team cohesion improves. In other words, while the quality impact is, of course, paramount the social effects can also be important. More information thoughts on the social effects available here: <a href="http://smartbear.com/docs/CodeReviewSocialEffects.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://smartbear.com/docs/CodeReviewSocialEffects.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://pragmaticoutsourcing.com/2009/07/07/offshore-and-code-review/#comment-631</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragmaticoutsourcing.com/?p=920#comment-631</guid>
		<description>Hi Nick, 

I find this article to be very helpful. I do believe code review is very important in offshore development. Do you believe code review and auditing can be provided by a neutral 3rd party, bridging between buyer and vendor? If so, how should the 3rd party consultant position himself to bring both sides together? 

Best,

Jason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nick, </p>
<p>I find this article to be very helpful. I do believe code review is very important in offshore development. Do you believe code review and auditing can be provided by a neutral 3rd party, bridging between buyer and vendor? If so, how should the 3rd party consultant position himself to bring both sides together? </p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
